@hikari @SoniEx2 Well what I am thinking is that "WSL" can already mean multiple things (WSL1/WSL2) so if you expose the wsl interface (e.g., wslpath.exe, maybe use same mount points for win32 drive) then people who're already accustomed to making use of WSL will just find it is a drop in replacement vs what they're used to

Like maybe you could do BETTER than wsl but cross compatibility could lead to wins. Sometimes in my Windows tools I include "and here's how to use it from WSL" steps

@mcc @SoniEx2 yeah taking advantage of that familiarity would totally make sense! since the idea is you'd be using windows applications for as much as possible, it would already be reasonable to have a linux shell proxy available in wine land, and wsl.exe is the perfect name

@hikari @SoniEx2 "Wine Services for Linux"