Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

β€ͺit's a violent, destructive act, it's not something i want to be a trend, but if it's a rare occurrence, isn't it beautiful in its own way? that painting is now in several pieces, but it hasn't been completely destroyed, i believe. so, after repairs, it can be appreciated again.‬

Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

β€ͺlike in kintsugi, it will be put back together and become a more interesting object for having gone through this. and if perhaps the damage will still be visible, then appreciating the work will remind the viewer that it has been damaged, and perhaps make them consider why.‬

Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

β€ͺi would have had a different opinion if they'd torched it. that's not the same action.‬

Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

β€ͺand that's just one way to look at it. you could also write a bunch about the action as a statement about power, or how it's provocative, for example.‬

β€ͺanyway that's my contribution to the discourse. art is close to my heart, i enjoy this more than arguing about programming.‬

Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

β€ͺi think, as an artist, i'd be honoured if someone wanted to harm one of my works, because that implies it had meaning to them‬

Saagar Jha

(replying to Kawaragi Momoka 🌟 (one hikari of too many))
@hikari If you think about it nobody bats an eye when we ruin the work of art that is this planet