MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

so, finally, what happened in 2006? well, you can probably guess at this point what occurred in many essentially identical 2006es: the tiny conspiracy of old men tried to use their half-century-long chain of side-channels to reach back a few decades and prevent media being lost.

MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

but we don't live in a timeline where they succeeded, because… well, co-ordination problems are hard?

there could be a timeline where they do succeed, but i think a conspiracy of (at least) hundreds maintaining a causality loop of decades is just too big.

MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

ok i'm done

MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many)

(replying to MEMちょ 🌟 (one hikari of too many))

thanks for reading my weird fiction i made up as i was going along

the original… concept… was like a single sentence and was gonna be about market forces instead, but the feeling of the conclusion i ended up with is similar