6 replies
@saagar@federated.saagarjha.com I think I saw this - isn't this related to some weird "crypto for contributions" thing???
1 replies
38 Likes • 14 Reposts • Link
11 replies
@saagar At least sudo isn't a critical piece of the security of almost every Unix-based system on the planet. Oh wait, it is.
@saagar link?
1 replies
@saagar llms can spot a large variety of bugs that static analyzers don’t catch, yeah sometimes also hallucinate some. But combined with asan, clang analyzer and valgrind they are a really powerful solution for code review and bug catching. So I wouldn’t say sudo’s code is bad, but software engineering is so hard that it’s easy to find ways to improve the quality over time. C coding practices evolved and that’s a techdebt we are all used to face every day
@saagar The maintainer does seem to have commented/done review on some, but some of the PRs either fix security issues, or introduce some, finding out which would require some more experience with the codebase. Anyway, very scary stuff.
@saagar sudo as in, *the* sudo millions of people and computers use every day??
@saagar Two of them did have comments, though: https://github.com/sudo-project/sudo/pull/498 this one points out an issue that was then resolved by him. https://github.com/sudo-project/sudo/pull/490 THIS one, an actual conversation (albeit a short one) on potentially deprecating and removing SecureID support
1 replies
@saagar well I guess that's one way to really juice your stats on GitHub, and make it so you can claim you contributed to a bunch of major projects.
1 replies
@saagar I would say project owners should be able to rate submissions, but then again project owners are very often huge jerks so that is a terrible idea.
1 replies
@saagar he might just be using some fancy new spellchecker he came across.

