Saagar Jha
(replying to Saagar Jha)
…because, I mean, the thing we usually see is people getting hacked because their code is just broken, not backdoored. So maybe we’ve finally reached the point where the code was just functional enough to make trying this attractive. One can hope, at least
Saagar Jha
(replying to Saagar Jha)
*Or maybe not, which is the other thing I am a little hopeful about. The steps needed to find this were quite impressive but absent of any other information about backdoors, in particular the ones that actually stay hidden, this got discovered pretty quickly relatively speaking
Saagar Jha
(replying to Saagar Jha)
So like, statistically, it might be that making a backdoor that is actually undetectable for a while is really difficult. “Many eyes make all bugs shallow” and whatnot, except in a kind of different Bayesian version that nobody really likes but is a little reassuring
Saagar Jha
(replying to Saagar Jha)
An extreme case of Hyrum’s Law I guess, where people will accidentally and unknowingly become dependent on their code not being backdoored