Saagar Jha

(replying to Saagar Jha)
@osy86 Also other people have been grumbling about this but I’ll come out and say it: gtfo with your “auditability”. You don’t care about auditability. You care about your intellectual property. This blog post is hilariously nonsensical

Saagar Jha

(replying to Saagar Jha)
@osy86 You can’t say “researchers can inspect both hardware and software [for iPhone]” and then later go “this is the first time we are providing plaintext iBoot”. You made it difficult for researchers to do their job for *years*. Now suddenly they are providing a vital service?

Saagar Jha

(replying to Saagar Jha)
@osy86 Like, you decide to hand researchers a decrypted version (of what is still a binary blob, to be clear) the moment you needed to advertise that your cloud was safe and secure? What do you want, a medal?
3 replies →
3 replies

osy

(replying to Saagar Jha)

@saagar I know it's not your intention but I find it funny that all the messages look like they're addressed directly to me. Yes sir I will consult with Mr Cook and get back to you.

Saagar Jha

(replying to osy)
@osy86 Appreciate it

Thijs Alkemade

(replying to Saagar Jha)

@saagar They don’t have the budget for a code audit, so they crowdsource it. And they can just close all reports that require Apple to act maliciously as “Informative”.


spv

(replying to Saagar Jha)

@saagar @osy86 yes, i actually do want a medal, thank you.